The Hydra Syndrome
Have you ever noticed how you, as a writer, see-saw?
For one heady moment
you know you're brilliant and then, later, with just as much clarity,
you know what you do is awful. It's the writer's curse.
I've
noticed this happens at certain times in the writing process.
When
the ideas are fresh and you're starting out on a project, the
adrenaline is flowing, the words are spewing on to the page -
everything seems so clear, so clever, so you.
And
then after, when you look back, the words seem dull, the structure
contrived and the talent - well, non-existent. But then... later, it
can seem smooth and inspired again... and then, even later...
dire.
Hold up! What's
happening here?
I call
it The Hydra Syndrome or, for short, THS.
You
may remember that the Hydra was a mythological creature with many
heads - and each time one was cut off, another sprouted in its
place.
And the trouble
with being a writer is that we too have many heads. Some are kind and
benevolent, some are harsh and critical. And it doesn't matter how
often we try to quash one head's opinion of what we do, there's
always another that will have the alternate point of view.
It
depends on our moods I think. When we're happy and confident, our
words seem to fire all the right neurons on the brain, the synaptic
gaps are bridged with ease. There's more than just the words in our
writing - there's a whole world of meaning implicit.
But
then sometimes when we're tired and listless, our brains are foggy
and the words seem empty, unable to quite convey the richness we
wanted to invoke.
At
other times, we feel nothing. We see the words for what they are -
just words: pale shadows of reality with no depth, no power, no
meaning.
Whenever I'm
suffering from a bout of THS, I have to remind myself that, when
reading through a different head, I thought my writing was fine. But
then I think, am I deluding myself? Maybe the bad head that hates my
writing is the true head? Maybe the happy head is a liar and is
secretly chuckling behind my back... oh, the woes of writing!
The
other day was a good example.
I'd
just finished editing (for about the twentieth time) the first 9500
words of my new novel, intending it for submission. I was pretty darn
proud of what I'd done. As well as the words being perfect (or so I
thought) there seemed also a profound depth of hidden meaning, subtle
interconnectivity and the odd clever nuance that would have my
readers in awe, enrapt... and yet...
I
gave it to Robyn, my partner, to read. As she did so, I waited,
butterflies threatening to burst out of my stomach like the alien in,
um, Alien.
At least
she read the whole thing in one sitting. I was dreading that she'd
put it down and say, "I'll read the rest tomorrow." That
would have hurt. Big time.
Anyway.
At the end she said, "Yeah, it's excellent." But, of
course, because she didn't say it's brilliant, I was
disappointed.
"What's
wrong with it?" I cried.
"Nothing.
It's really good." Really good? What's that supposed to mean?
She must hate it!
Tentatively,
I ask, "Anything that might need fixing?"
"Well,
there's a couple of typos." Typos! Gah - after twenty passes!
How could that be? "Nothing major," she
added.
"And?"
"Well..."
Here it comes, I thought. "You've got a couple of point of view
issues. You tell the story from one guy's point of view in one
chapter and I think you should do it from the hero's."
I
slumped. Reality check. Thanks, Robyn.
She
was right of course. I have to go back and fix it. But now I'm
thinking my 9500 words are heavily flawed, and will remain so, until
I've dealt with the problem. Now I wouldn't show my submission to
another soul because it's dreadful, awful, until I've rewritten at
least two large chunks of it. But then, maybe then, it will be
perfect! Yay!
And to
think, I used to wonder why my mother thought that writing was a
silly way to make a living. Maybe she was right. I can find at least
one of my Hydra heads that would rush to agree with her.
But
I think the real point is that we need to be critical of our writing
- at least some of the time. If we thought that what we did was
always brilliant, we'd lose objectivity and we wouldn't want to
improve, wouldn't know how to improve even.
Being
hard on our writing sometimes is what makes us better writers.
But
at those other, special times, loving what we do is what keeps us
doing it!
Keep
writing!
Creating
Better Writers
The
Writing Academy
Comments