Writing For Your Readers
Dear
Fellow
Writer,
I'm engaged in a strange stand-off with Amazon at the moment. I've written a Sherlock Holmes story that they won't approve for publication.
I assume it's because they're concerned about copyright. Do they seriously think I haven't done my homework in this regard?
The Sherlock Holmes character has been in the public domain since 1981. No less than three recent high court rulings in the US have confirmed that nobody owns the Sherlock Holmes character, not even the Conan-Doyle Estate.
If Amazon doesn't approve my new story soon, I'll be forced to publish it elsewhere, perhaps on this blog.
Come on, guys, get with the program. Gagging writers is not a good look for you!
Keep writing!
Rob@easywaytowrite.com
I assume it's because they're concerned about copyright. Do they seriously think I haven't done my homework in this regard?
The Sherlock Holmes character has been in the public domain since 1981. No less than three recent high court rulings in the US have confirmed that nobody owns the Sherlock Holmes character, not even the Conan-Doyle Estate.
If Amazon doesn't approve my new story soon, I'll be forced to publish it elsewhere, perhaps on this blog.
Come on, guys, get with the program. Gagging writers is not a good look for you!
UPDATE:
Amazon just emailed me to say they think my story is so authentic, they
believe it to be an actual Sherlock Holmes story! Flattering - but how
does that jive with the zombies that Holmes and Watson are
fighting!!!
Keep writing!
Rob@easywaytowrite.com
Writing For Your Readers
When writing for publication it's important to keep your
eventual reader at the forefront of your mind.
Writing primarily for yourself can be a lot of fun and,
if that's what motivates you, then that's the best way forward, at least for
the first draft.
Eventually, however, it's your readers who will decide
whether you have written a book that they find satisfying, worthy, and
purposeful.
It could be that, during the writing and editing process, some
degree of self-discipline is required to fulfill the objective of writing a book
that people actually want to read - and will enjoy reading.
My preferred approach is to write quickly and edit methodically
later.
I find writing the first draft fast and furiously keeps the
juices pumping and doesn't allow for too much time to reconsider word-choice,
direction, momentum etc., until after
the first draft.
Writing slowly, painstakingly, I find, tends to make me
hesitant, overly self-conscious, and can sometimes lead to getting blocked if I
can't decide little things, for instance, like where to put a comma.
Far better to get down as much as possible of the meat without
questioning the creative process and stick with the decision to come back to
the writing later when the first draft is fully written and complete. Even if
the first draft strikes you as a mess.
I'm a great believer in having a plan and sticking to it.
So, having made the decision to write a thriller, for example,
you should write with the intention of thrilling
your reader. You need to know your purpose before you begin.
When writing your first draft quickly and without too much
agonizing, try not to get sidetracked into overdeveloping ideas that are not
pertinent to your purpose. Stay as focused, in other words, as you can on the intention of your writing.
The key difference between writing literary work and genre
fiction is, to me, about maintaining discipline.
Literary works may meander without purpose, hopping from one
set of profound observations to another. This may lead your reader to feel
rudderless.
Genre writing is often more focused on the needs of the
reader and invariably requires more work in the writing and the editing from
the writer.
To me, the important issues are clarity and direction. Your
story or nonfiction piece should shine with a clear and obvious thrust that
takes a reader on a focused journey.
A good narrative contains logic that can easily be followed
by most readers, whatever their upbringing or education level. The author's job
is to present an alternate view of reality that is compelling. Only text that
is easily understood can be fully absorbed and endorsed by a reader.
The need to emphasize logic and sense in your stories may
mean that your final editing process is ruthless. You may need to remove paragraphs,
sections, and even chapters that have little or nothing to do with the story intention.
When editing, you will need to become acutely aware of how
the writing flows from the point of view of the
reader.
This is one of the main reasons why you should take time out
between edits to distance yourself from your own work: you need to be able to
see your writing from a reader's perspective.
If you can't manage that trick, show your work to others
before you publish or submit to legacy publishers.
At the end of the day, writing for publication is about
writing for other people: to entertain, to inform, and to help them transcend
the norm. Your friends and fellow writers are often the very people who will
tell you whether you're succeeding in that objective.
There's a whole new industry growing online that offers to
edit your material for publication - for a price, of course.
But actually, to me, using a third party editor can cause
long term problems for you. Not least because, unless you edit regularly,
you'll never learn how to do it properly.
You really should be editing to the best of your own ability
at all times.
This does not mean giving your work a cursory once over just
after you've written it (as far too many new writers do.) No. It means studying
every word, sentence, every piece of punctuation, grammar, every nuance and
stylistic inflection - and to keep editing until you know for sure that what
you've done is good enough for mass market consumption.
Other writers are most often the best critics because they're
coming from a different place than you and they may have higher standards than
even most readers.
Before you proceed to publication or submission, my advice
would be that your thoroughly edited manuscript should be read by at least two
or three other writers.
Comments