The Amazon Kindle book has become a surprise hit for me, so much so that I've decided to make it into a 12 EPISODE series - just like a TV show.
I've teamed up with another US writer - George Hogge - who has helped me plot the next three SEASONS - and we intend to keep writing them until we run out of ideas!
If you want to keep up with this hugely popular - and highly reviewed - original concept fiction series, go get the first one NOW!
Your Success is My Concern
There are three main keys to writing suspense fiction - and a few practical considerations we will look at later in this article.
Key One: The writer knows more than the reader
In any kind of suspense fiction it's important that the writer has a clear idea of the twist and turns his / her story will take - and hide their inevitability from the reader.
As soon as the reader can second guess the plot, the element of suspense is lost.
You have to understand that when readers are absorbed in your book, they are actually reading two stories: the one you put on the page and the one inside their heads.
Your job is to make the reader believe the story in their head is the correct one, while introducing twists and turns they could not have predicted given the information you've presented.
There's fine line between credibility and innovation.
An unbelievable twist won't work - you'll break the fictive dream.
But turns that are too obvious will have the reader yawning and wondering why they're continuing to read.
Stephen King says he likes to write without knowing what's going to happen. The logic being that if he doesn't know what's coming, then the reader won't see it either.
James Patterson takes the opposite tack. He plans his stories minutely, building in shocks and twists right from the planning stage.
Either way, the element of suspense is an implicit key element in the storytelling.
New writers have a tendency to want to put everything in, to fill the pages with their genius - and hold nothing back.
More experienced writers know that often the less said the better.
You need to let the reader do some of the work - because they like doing that.
In the simplest terms this is why crime authors often don't explain what police acronyms mean anymore. Not to show off or to confuse - but to allow readers to become part of the fictional world.
Even more experienced writers know that it's a game - that by deliberately misdirecting the reader, you create in them a kind of awe at your writing prowess - because they can see it's not all about the words.
The reader is impressed that it's the storytelling journey you've taken them on that's clearly more important to you, the writer.
I like to think I used a combination of Stephen King's and James Patterson's techniques when I write fiction. From an early stage, before the writing, I have the plot down - filled with unexpected but credible plot turns - but I often don't know the exact ending.
The big twist at the conclusion occurs to me as I'm writing - usually about five chapters from the end.
Key Two: The protagonist knows less than the reader
The easiest way to visualize this key in action is to imagine those scenes where the good guy is walking slowly down a corridor, gun primed, not knowing if there's anyone in the house BUT the reader knows the killer is already there - or at least thinks he probably is!
In more sophisticated fiction where action and adventure are important, you'll often see the protagonist heavily involved in hunting down clues, saving villagers and maidens and chasing bad guys, while at the same time, the writer is showing you the authorities making plans to help or thwart the hero without his knowledge.
This technique has two advantages.
One, the reader feels a sense of objective control - and can root for hero when the odds are against him.
This is the equivalent of the armchair news reader who likes to keep up with daily intrigue.It's the same mentality involved, hence the success of writers like Frederick Forsyth and Tom Clancy.
Two, the protagonist always has the element of surprise up his sleeve.
Robert Ludlum uses this technique all the time. A seemingly impossible scenario is solved by the sheer grit - and often physical prowess - of the hero.
Of course, in these types of stories, the writer knew all along how the hero was going to react in any given situation.
And even the more modern, vulnerable, workaday heroes like Logan McRae in Stuart MacBride's fabulous novels can end up using his tenacity in ways the reader finds unexpected - but totally credible.
Key Three: A combination of the above two keys
Since Dan Brown helped popularize the way we experience thrillers with The Da Vinci Code, modern suspense writers have understood the importance of plotting for shock value. And ending on a twist.
One of the major results of this way of writing is that the reader has to do more work.
Imagine you're in a new environment and you have nobody on hand to explain exactly what's going on. You see the action, you listen to people talking and you try to understand what's happening...
Viola. This is what you must do in your suspense fiction.
You don't need piles of exposition to explain who is who, what they're talking about or why anything is happening. You just need to show it all - and let the reader figure it out.
The reader will trust you if they sense you know what you're doing.
And the way to achieve that trust is to work hard on your plot and characters and story before you begin the writing. Know your story inside and out, upside and down before you begin.
And even if you're not sure of everything, don't labor over explanations or try to justify anything the reader might not get, at least at first.
I guess it's about not talking down to your readers.
Regard them as peers who understand what you mean without baby talking them through every scene.
We all implicitly understand character motivation these days. We see it all the time in movies and on TV. We don't need a translator on hand to explain: this is a human, he has needs, goals, he will be tested etc. We get all that.
In your suspense writing, have the courage to leave information out. Either stuff that is implicit or obvious or things you want to shock the reader with later on.
Suspense is not just about what's on the page. It's about what you don't write too.
Oh, and remember to edit fiercely after the first draft. Especially when you need to remove the author, namely you, from your story.
There's nothing more irritating to a reader than to be constantly reminded the story was written by a 'writer'.
And as Elmore Leonard famously advised: immediately strike out anything that smacks of 'good writing'!
Good suspense writing appears effortless - and comes from the characters and never from the omniscient author.
MY CURRENT AMAZON FICTION: